Recall answers the opposite question: of all the real cases, how many did we catch?
It ignores false alarms entirely.
So it measures the cost of missing something.
It is the metric you want when a miss is dangerous.
An undetected tumour, a fraud that goes through, an alarm that stays silent.
You can push recall to a perfect score by flagging absolutely everything.
The model then cries wolf constantly, and recall still looks perfect.
That is why recall on its own is never enough either.
It has to be read next to precision, always.
Lowering the threshold lifts recall and lowers precision, every time.
In screening problems high recall usually wins, with a human checking afterwards.
The first stage catches nearly everything and the second stage removes the noise.
Recall is sometimes called sensitivity, or the true positive rate.
Those are the same number wearing different names in different fields.
Report the threshold you used, or the number cannot be compared with anything.